Compare → CompanyCam
Field Wizard vs CompanyCam
CompanyCam is the best way to photograph a jobsite. Field Wizard is how you capture the numbers beside the pictures — readings, pass/fail, quantities, a signature — and turn them into a document and an invoice.
Written by us. So every line below either links to somewhere you can check it, or says plainly that CompanyCam wins it.
Side by side
3 of these 8 rows go to CompanyCam. If that number were zero this table would be an advertisement.
| Field Wizard | CompanyCam | Edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Photographs of the jobsite | Photo fields, time and location stamped | Their whole product, and far better at it | CompanyCam |
| Photo annotation and galleries | No | Yes | CompanyCam |
| Crew adoption | A form is work | A camera app people open | CompanyCam |
| Readings, measurements, pass/fail | Yes | No | Field Wizard |
| Signatures on the record | Yes | No | Field Wizard |
| One branded PDF of the whole visit | Yes | Photo reports | Field Wizard |
| Reaches an invoice without retyping | Yes | No | Field Wizard |
| Running both | Our API and webhooks are built for it | Works alongside | Even |
What CompanyCam is
Jobsite photo documentation for contractors, and the best-loved product in this comparison. Photos organized by project automatically, annotated, shared with the homeowner, turned into reports. Crews adopt it without being made to, which is rare and worth respecting.
Go and look at CompanyCam yourself →Where Field Wizard is different
Each of these is something you can confirm, not something you have to take on faith.
Field Wizard is the structured-data side of the same jobsite. A photo here sits inside a form that also holds readings, pass/fail logic, calculations and a signature, and comes out as one branded PDF.
What a form holds →That form is tied to the rest of the job — the customer record, the parts used, the estimate and the invoice.
The whole loop →If you already run CompanyCam, our API and webhooks are how you keep it. A submission can fire an event the moment it lands.
API and webhooks →Where CompanyCam beats us
If this section were empty you would be right not to believe the rest of the page.
- For photographs, they are better than us, and it is not close. We have photo fields on a form with time and location stamps. We do not have photo annotation, project galleries, before-and-after comparison, or anything like their automatic organization of thousands of site photos.
- Crew adoption is their whole design. If your problem is that nobody documents anything, a camera app people actually open beats a form nobody fills in.
Which one you should pick
Choose CompanyCam if
- The job to be done is 'photograph the site properly and keep it organized'. That is their product and they are excellent at it.
- Your crews will not fill in forms, and photos are the realistic ceiling on what you will get from them.
Choose Field Wizard if
- You need the numbers as well as the pictures — readings, measurements, pass/fail, quantities, a signature.
- The output has to be a document: a branded PDF a customer, a warranty claim or an auditor will accept.
- You want the same record to reach an invoice without being re-typed.
About this page. We describe what CompanyCam is built for, not what it costs or what its plans include — those change on their schedule and we will not quote a number we have not read on their own page. Go to their site for pricing and limits, and to ours for ours, which is published with a seat calculator. Last reviewed August 2026. If something here is out of date or unfair, tell us and we will fix it.
See it with your own data
Start free, seed a sample customer, employee and parts list for your trade in one click, and fill in a real form. No card required.
Start free →30 days free · no card · cancel yourself any time. No seat minimum.
Rather talk it through against CompanyCam first? Email us — a person answers, and they will tell you if you are better off with CompanyCam.